Saturday, February 25, 2023

Spain 1870

 Genuine Stamps
Ed.107

Ed. 108

Ed. 109

Ed. 110

Ed. 111

Ed.112

Ed. 113

Ed.114

Ed. NE3 - not issued

Features of the original stamps
1. White area & line break in top left
2. & 3. Line breaks in the outer oval
4. Line break
5. Line break
6. V Notch in the end of the C


Forgeries

Ed. 107
Forgery Type I
Very crude and rough
Letters are awkward and uneven
Coarse shading throughout


Forgery Type II
Crude forgery
Eyes are narrow
Top letters are short
Wide spacing in background waves


Type II Block

Forgery Type III
Decent forgery
Top letters are short and not well aligned
The eyes are not properly shaped


Forgery Type IV
Decent forgery
Top letters are thin
Face and neck shading is short and lacking


Forgery Type V
Good forgery
Shading in eyebrows and chin is different
Eyes are slightly different


Forgery Type VI
Crude forgery
Background waves are shallow
Tired droopy eyes
Heavy shading


Forgery Type VII
Pupils too dark
Bottom letters are thinner
Very dark background
Chin & neck shading wrong


Forgery Type VIII
Good forgery similar to the Type V
Background in the oval irregular
Letters are thinner
Eyes are slightly different


Forgery Type X – many genuine traits visible
Very good forgery – probably Segui
Shading around contour of face and neck is lacking
Shading on chin and neck is heavier


Type X block


Forgery Type XI
Excellent forgery – possibly Sperati
Almost identical to Type X but more breaks in the lines



Forgery Type XII
Possibly a Type XI with fake cancels


Ed. 108
Type I
Very good forgery
Very heavy shading lines throughout
White space in neck is different



Type II
Somewhat crude
Details lacking
Eyes are wrong



Type III
fair forgery
Very heavy shading on chin
Eyes and shading are different
Small s below is misshapen



Type IV
Very thick letters
Heavy shading throughout


Ed. 109
Sperati forgery
Almost perfect forgery as it was taken from an original
Minor differences in the shading especially the hair
Shading around the eyelid is more pronounced



Type I
Very good forgery – possibly Fournier
Breaks around outer oval frame missing
L in MIL is too short



Type II Segui
Many minor details are missing
Eyes are too narrow


Type II block


Type III
2nd top C is distorted
Heavy chin shading
Shading around eyes too heavy
Has what looks like an "a" in the mid left frame

Ed. 111
Sperati Forgery
The loss of white space between the horizontal lines of shading is very noticeable
The curved frameline at top is broken twice, at left and near center
The thick inner curved frame lines do not meet at the top left corner and there is another break to the right in the top line


Fournier Forgery
Lacks genuine features
Eyes are different
Shading lines different



Segui forgery
Genuine traits lacking
Second 0 of 600 not as inclined
Eyes are very different



Ed. 112
Sperati forgery
The loss of white space between the horizontal lines of shading is very noticeable
The curved frameline at top is broken twice, at left and near center
The thick inner curved frame lines do not meet at the top left corner and there is another break to the right in the top line


Segui Forgery
Genuine traits are missing
Eyes are very different
Face looks wider

The star of the matron's crown has its lower tip twisted to the right.

Segui Barrado


Fournier Forgery
Genuine traits missing
Heavy shading throughout
Lower U is too high

Ed. 114
Sperati Forgery
The paper, perforation and cancel are genuine on the above forgeries. The design of a lower valued stamp of the same series was removed by Sperati, he then printed the design on it. He made this forgery look like as if the cancel was on top. 
 Flaw in the "S" of ROOMS at the top.
In the middle of the right leg of the top "A" there is a spiky color.
In the top left corner the inside frame lines do not meet


Segui Forgery
The star of the crown is shaped and inclined differently
Eyes are very different

Segui Block

Segui Barrado

Monday, February 20, 2023

Spain 1930 Airmail

 Intended primarily for sale to collectors, the original issue of 25,000 sets was valid for postage for only three days. 
Excellent litho forgeries exist. Given the limited numbers issued and short validation dates, the catalog values do not reflect the rare originals but the vast quantity of forgeries

Genuine stamps

The original stamps have different control numbers on them.

Forgeries
The forgeries are easily distinguished by 2 main features

- the forgery has a dot placed immediately between and below the 93 of 1930. Below the dot are 2 equally spaced dots and below them is a single dot directly below the first one.

- The top right corner line joins the ones below it while in the genuine it does not

The control number on the reverse of the forgeries is always A000,000 in blue or black.

Friday, February 17, 2023

Oldenburg 1852-61

 - Except for the last issue, all the stamps are lithographed. The same method used by forgers
- The various differences in size of the several issues depend on, how much the paper was dampened, and how much it contracted again after printing.
- Copies with original gum of the first issues are usually to be regarded with mistrust, for there were no stocks of leftovers, and so unused copies with original gum are very hard to find.

1852
1/30 Thaler Black on Dark Blue
Imperforate. Lithographed.
Size of stamp picture: 17 , by 20 mm.
1,500,000 printed
There are 4 types of this issue (some argue that there are sub-types). Each has its own characteristics.

Type I
1. Dots in crown
2. Foot of “r” extends outwards
3. “1” touches the ermine
4. Bottom of “3” wider than the top
5. “H & A ” joined
6. ‘Top of “U & R ” joined
7. Distinguishing feature of Type I
8. Spike in bottom of “G”
9. “5” much broader at the bottom
10. “2” touches the frame


Type II
Size is 18 X 20 mm
General traits same as Type I
1. “2” does not touch the frame
2. Bottom of “3” not as wide as Type I
3. Key feature of Type II
4. “H & A” joined
5. Key feature of Type I


Type III
1. Bottom & top of “3” same width
2. “H, A and L” joined
3. Tip of shield extends further in scroll than Type I or II
4. Key Feature
5. Key feature – narrow opening in fold


Type IV
Basically the same features as Type I
1. “2” does not touch the frame
2. Key feature – shading in loop
3. “U and R” much shorter the first letters
4. Key feature



Forgeries
Crude forgery
“THALER” too wide and cut off, bottom and top of “3” even
Bottom lettering very crude, heavy coarse shading


A good forgery
Shield cut off on the right side
“1” does not touch the ermine


1/15th
Same design as before.
1 / 15 Thaler black/rose. Type I , II and III.
Imperforate. Lithographed
Size of stamp picture: Type I: 18 X 20 mm. Type II : 18 X 20 mm.
350,000 printed

General Features
1. Top of “1” does not touch the ermine, the top line extends to the right
2. The top line extends to the right
3. Bottom of “5” is very wide
4. The “H, A and L” are joined
5. The tip of the shield does not enter the scroll below
6. The end of the ’2” has a sharp curving tip
7. There is a dot inside the ornament
8. Large “4” does not touch the frame
9. Small “4” does touch the frame


Type I

Type II

Type III
Type I, II and III. The shading in the ermine is much heavier in Type III and the frame lines are joined in the upper left corner.

Forgeries
A good forgery
The small”4” does not touch the frame
The “1” does not touch the ermine
The bottom of the “5” is flat
There is a period after "OLDENBURG"
Apparently sold by Spiro

A very crude forgery with a long list of issues – note the very thick border


Peter Winter 1980's forgery
A very good forgery
The outer frame line is irregular

1/10th
Same design as before.
1 / 10 Thaler black / light yellow, lemon-yellow. Type I and II.
Imperforate. Lithographed.
250,000 printed

Original

Forgeries
GPS Type I
Lithographed Spiro
T & R touch the frame
Letters of THALER not joined

GPS Type II
The crown is completely wrong
The numerals and letters are too small

The 1 touches the bottom of the ermine
The ends of "THALER" touch the shield

Forgery GPS Type V
No period after "OLDENBURG"
Odd crown with 3 circular openings
The right 3 is too small & thick
Background shading not made up of horizontal lines

1855 1/3
Imperforate. Lithographed.
Paper: Medium strong or thin.
200,000 were printed
1. Dash in ornament
1a. Thin frame line cuts off the cross
2. 2 dots in bottom of cross

2. 2 dots in bottom of cross
3. Tip of “1” does not touch the ermine.
4. End of “C” is long and points up
5. Bottom of “3” is flat
6. Large dot very close to shield frame
7. Same size dot as 6.
8. Tip of shield cuts the scroll line and is over the center of “N”
9. Serif of “G” touches the line
10. Bottom of “LD” joined
11. Left frame line more inclined than right side
12. Note large dot position and touching 3 shading lines
13. Thick lines on right sides of ribbons
14. Small T shape at end of “4”


Forgeries
Little shading in scroll besides “OLDENBURG”
Several side letters touch the frame line
Thick outer frame line

GPS forgery type II
The G of "OLDENBURG" is too low
There is too much space between the 3 & b
The ch on the left side are joined

GPS forgery type III Spiro
"OLDENBURG" is in a curved banner
The top of the G of Gr is thin & pointed

Sperati Type B on the right, original left
The B of "OLDENBURG" is cracked where the two loops join
There is no extra black dot below the serif and attached to the G


1/3 1859
Coat of arms of the State of Oldenburg with crown.
1/3 Silbergroschen black/green.
The number issued varies between 50,000 and 90,000
A rare & high CV stamp in both used and unused

1. The thin frame line has a break here
2. The left leg of the “N” is long
3. The “G” is small
4. The frame lines are not parallel and are wider here
5. There is a dot, on some it is barely visible
6 & 10 Note the difference in the shapes in size and ends
7. The “S” is large

8. the “C” is small
9. The bottom line of the “E” is generally broken
11. Both tips of the left ribbon are pointed


Forgeries
Given the high CV, this stamp was a prime candidate for forgery with some 15 varieties with most being crude.

Forgery GPS Type I
The G of "Groschen" is tall & thin. The c and lower portion of the h are too tall
In both fractions, the 3 is very tall

Forgery GPS Type IV
The letters of "OLDENBURG" are too small and the top of the cross lies under the "E".
The bottom of the shield points between "Drittel" and "Groschen".
In each fraction, the "1" (nearly) touches the fraction bar and the "3" is too large.
The right lobe of the shield does rot protrude sufficiently and is too far from the oval frame


Forgery GPS Type V
In ''OLDENBURG", the "N" lies directly over the top of the cross but is much too large, as is the "O".
The bottom of the shield points between "Drittel" and "Grosechen".
All letters and numerals are too thick and coarse.
The top of the shield is excessively curved.

Another version of Forgery GPS Type V


Forgery GPS Type VI
A fantasy accredited to Spiro
A huge crown
Ornaments on the sides not present in the original

Forgery GPS Type VIII
There is a wide space between the G & r
The numerals are thick
No shading lines in ornaments on side of shield
Odd looking ball beneath cross

Forgery GPS Type X
In OLDENBURG, the top of the "N" leans over and touches the "B",
The space between Drittel and Groschen is too wide.
The space between the two large oval frame lines is too wide.
At the bottom center, several of the circular ornaments arc missing.
The right "3" is much too large.


Billigs Type VI
Very small top letters
Right 3 is inclined
Thin lower letters

Despite the obvious differences in the numerals, thick letters and different crown, this bad forgery sold for $800 on an auction

Forgery GPS Type XI
Known in black on green paper resembling the original.
The crown and the shield arc too high in lire central oval; the crown touches the oval at top and there is too much space below the point ot the shield.
The fractions of value are too low in their ovals, particularly at left which is larger than the right one.
The curving ornament above GROSCHEN is too narrow.

Forgery GPS Type XII - Peter Winter used
All excellent imitation in black on yellowish green paper produced by Winter of Bremen in the 1980rs.
The fine shading lines, especially in the top and bottom banderoles, are more interrupted than in most originals.
The head of the "G" of GROSCHEN drops downward slightly at the serif rather than continuing upward.
This forgery mimics all of the frame line extensions and connections seen in the original
Exists "unused", "used", "on piece" and "on coved' (front), sometimes with a boxed Bremen "cancel" in red and usually with "Replik" on the reverse.

Peter Winter unused

Sperati Type A right compared to genuine left
The bottom frame line extend to far to the left (both types)
There is a white dot in the lower portion of the "1" of "1/3" at right side
Sperati applied forged cancels "NEUENBURG 6/2", "NEUENBURG 15/12" and "ELSFLETH 8/12" to these forgeries. 

Sperati Type B right compared to genuine left
The B of "OLDENBURG" has a dot on the left side


1859 1 Groschen
1. Lower part of the “B” much larger than the top and the bottom stroke slants upwards
2. The top of the “R” is wider than the bottom.
3. The left and right ornaments are different in shape and size
4. The right oval has a dot middle left, the left oval has one also but not prominent on all samples
5. The bottom of the cross has a semi circular shape
6. The top of the “c” extends out and down
7. The top of the cross slope downwards to the right

Forgeries
Forgery Billigs Type I
The E, G & h touch the frame
Large space between L & D of "OLDENBURG"
Guide lines visible
The animal on the shield bottom is unknown


Forgery Billigs Type II
Very dark shading
Too many pearls on bottom
Cross touches the frame
Top letters are too tall

Another Type II forgery


Modern Forgery - Winter?
This is an excellent forgery
The curve in the G & s are different from the original
The top of the left one is straight not inclined
The top be is shaped differently


Another modern forgery


A truly primitive example

Top letters very uneven in height
Crown is slightly lopsided
Bottom letters touch the frame


1859 2 Groschen
1. Top of “E” slopes down to the right
2. Bottom of the “E” much longer than the top
3. The globe is slightly wider than the cross and divided into 3 sections
4. The point is inclined to the left and the tip is rounded
5. Clear dots in both numeral frames
6. The left oval touches the shape below
7. The top and Bottom lines of the “Z” are generally broken
8. The left lobe shape does not touch the banner below


Forgeries
Forgery Billigs Type I
Cross much larger
2's have a long left tail
Top letters much taller
Ball below cross is embedded in crown
Curved elements on both sides have much larger openings


Forgery Billigs Type II
Top letters are taller
Cross touches frame 2's are thinner & larger
Crown has larger openings
Side ornaments are very different


Forgery Billigs Type VIII
Larger cross
Crown is misshapen
Top letters are too tall


Modern Forgery - Winter?
Top N is more inclined
Top letters serifs are more pronounced
Overall shading is darker


Forgery Sperati 
The top left corners do not meet properly
There is a break in the top frameline above the L
The top of the top E is level

1859 3 Groschen
1. The “B” is larger than the other letters
2. The left upper leg of the “U” is longer than the right one
3. There are dots in both ovals
4. This mark seems to consistently occur
Note – the dots in 3. have been described as “secret” engraver’s marks. I cannot say their purpose but as obvious as they are, the term “secret” seems far-fetched.
The mark in 4. however is more random and a forger might assume it is only a flaw and omit it.
5. The frame line on the left side of the shield is thinner than the right side
6. The bottom of the cross has a small semi oval shape smaller than the width of the cross.
7. The shape touches the banner. Note also that the left and right shape are very different.
8. The top of the “h” has a long dash.
9. There are 7 distinct pearls
10. The shape of the “s” is uneven, the top curve is more open
11. The right leg of the “h” tilts inwards
12. The cross is visibly attached to the front of the globe


Forgeries
Forgery Billigs Type Fournier
This is an excellent forgery easily missed
The main difference is in the hatching which is missing in many area such as the top left and the ball under the cross
The top of the last lower e is narrower

Same as above unused
Both the used & unused were the most prominent forgeries and I suspect are in many old collections


Forgery Billigs Type II
Crude with lots of issues
Bottom letters are all wrong
The small cross touches the frame

Forgery Billigs Type IV
Top letters are taller & thinner
Bottom letters are too high
Tall cross
3"s are larger

Forgery Billigs Type Spiro
Top letters much taller
Large cross
Bottom letters taller & thinner
Tip of shield points to the o
Outside frame lines close together

Modern Forgery
Hatching more pronounced and with areas missing
Several breaks in outer frame line

1861 2 Groschen
Genuine
1. Lower leg extends out
2. Left side of U is thicker
3. Large well defined ball
4. Dot
5. Base of i split curves
6. Lower half of e is large
7. End of 2 short & pointed
8. Large dot
9. s has pronounced serifs
10. End of R curl up

Forgeries
Billigs Type I
Lacks dots
Lower letters tall and narrow
Top letters uneven
ENB joined
Shield touches frame

Billigs Type III
Large top letters
Several top letters joined
No dots in numerals
h has a spur top left

Billigs Type VIII
Top letters tall and thick
Odd shaped crown
Bottom of 2's slope downwards
No shading in ornaments below numerals


Billigs Type IXa
Letterpressed
Top letters tall
Very large numerals
No shading in ornaments below numerals
Crown & shield smaller

Unknown
Cross touches frame
Odd shaped shield
Letters of Groschen too large
Numeral ovals are narrow

Fournier Essays
These were part of the Geneva collection