Thursday, November 17, 2022

Spain 1864

 Engraved by José Pérez Vare.
Printed in typography at the National Stamp Factory.
Size 21 x 24 mm in sheets of 100 imperforated stamps
on colored paper.
Circulation: January 1, 1864 (4 cu.) And March 1, 1864
(the rest). Postal validity up to January 8, 1865.
Sold copies: (Ed = Edifil Catalog #)
Ed 63: 1,531,633
Ed 64: 49,504,787
Ed 65: 691,801
Ed 66: 24,699
Ed 67: 625,016
Ed 68: 527,962

Genuine Stamps


Barrados Issues
The barrado was used to cancel the sheets already issued and demonetized or invalid.

It consists of a coarse impression of five lines, the second and fourth of which are very thin and often it appears as only 3 thick lines

It was used to cancel complete sheets in the hands of the Factory, the Ministry or whoever was, but still to be sold.
The loose copies of a demonetized issue in the hands of individuals were "exchanged" for their equivalents of the new issue.

These issues are generally inexpensive but somewhat elusive. They are priced in specialized catalogs



Genuine Features
Note - some may be difficult to see and they may not all apply to
each value.
1. Curved line is broken
2. Space between 2 pearls under R
3. Although very close, no pearls touch
4. Break in joining line - not visible on all issues
5. White line space on back of neck
6. Circle and frame line do not touch
7. Odd shaped pearl
8. Break in line - not always visible
9. Break in line – not always visible
10. Flat top pearl
11. Lips visible
12. Short lines between long ones


A Note on Forgeries

For most collectors, they look at forgeries as being worthless and useless to keep.
Although it is true that the majority have little value, many others do and in some cases as much or more than the originals.
The 1864 Spanish Postal Forgeries are a very valuable series

Facsimiles of the Postal Forgeries

2 Cts Forgery

Genuine Ed 63

Forgery Type I - made by Torres
Printed by lithograph on thick yellowish paper. Crude design
1 It lacks the semicircles of the 4 stars of the corners.
2 The oval with the top stars are inside the first frame.
3 The oval ring of pearls is very crude and irregular
4 The top RE of CORREOS are too large
5 The eye has a sleepy look
6. The hair has very coarse lines


Forgery Type 2
Printed by lithography on very thick yellowish paper. Very crude design
1 CORREOS almost touches the bottom frame.
2 The star circles lack all definition
3 The pearls of the crown without point in its interior.
4 The oval ring of pearls lacks any definition
5 The "6" almost looks like a 0.
Although this forgery has a similarity with the previous one, it is probably by the same forger and perhaps a later printing with a worn and damaged die

Forgery Type III - this is the postal forgery previously shown
Printed by lithograph on medium yellowish paper. Overall very poorly designed
1 The balls that leave the bottom right star touch the circumference.
2 The Queen looks up.
3 Flat nose
4 Large "18" and "6" small.
5 The oval ring of pearls is very crude and irregular
6 The bottom C not inclined


4 Cts Forgeries

Ed 64 Genuine

Forgery Type I - Postal Forgery
Reasonable effort overall - probable a Segui forgery
1. CORREOS has thick letters
2. Pearls are uneven around the frame
3. Sad look on the face
4. Missing lines in the hair
5. Bottom letters and numerals are thicker


Forgery Type II - probable a Torres creation
Overall very crude
1. Facial features are all wrong
2. Pearls in the oval are solid and very uneven
3. Very large bottom letters and numerals
4. Tips of the crown are completely shaded
5. It lacks the semicircles of the 4 stars of the corners.


Forgery Type III
Crude and poorly designed
1. Large eye
2. Oval pearls missing and uneven
3. Many line breaks and artefacts in design
4. Right leg of second R in CORREOS extends and connects to the E

12 Cts  Forgeries
Ed 65 genuine stamp

Forgery Type I - Postal Forgery
1. All the letters and numerals are too thick
2. The oval pearls are broken, uneven and indistinct
3. The inner border is too thick


Forgery left compared to genuine right


Forgery Type II - probably a Segui forgery
1. Although reasonably well executed, there are many line breaks and artefacts
2. The oval pearls are missing and uneven
3. The outer frame is too thick on top
4. The 1864 numerals are distorted





19 Cts Forgeries
Ed 66 genuine stamp
Genuine Characteristics
1. Curved line is broken
2. Space between 2 pearls under R
3. Although very close, no pearls touch
4. Break in joining line
5. White line space on back of neck
6. Circle and frame line do not touch
7. Odd shaped pearl
8. Break in line
9. Break in line - not always visible
10. Flat top pearl
11. Lips visible
12. Short lines between long ones
As this is the most expensive of the series, the better quality forgers plied their craft. In particular Sperati who produced several excellent copies.


Fournier forgery
1. The right arm of the '4' of '1864' does not end vertically as in the genuine stamps.
2. Oval pearls are uneven and broken
3. Hair lines are broken or missing
4. The eye is more closed


Segui Forgery
An excellent and common dangerous forgery
Printed by typography on lilac paper.
1 Second "R" is large and the letters are thicker
2 The lower pearl of the upper right scroll is unshaded.
3 The eyebrow is formed by a line of the same thickness.
4 Neck and face is shaded heavier


Sperati Forgery
1. There is a white dot in the lower frameline below the 'O' of 'CTOS'.
2. There is also a break in the upper curved line above the first 'R' of 'CORREOS'.
Apparently two reproductions exists with the same distinguishing characteristics according to the handbook of the BPA. The cancels on these stamps are genuine (Sperati removed the design from a cheaper stamp, leaving the cancel intact). See below.



A signed proof of the Sperati forgery
The 2 distinguishing features are evident



Primitive forgery - possibly a Torres creation
It lacks all resemblance to the original

1 Rls Forgeries
Ed 67 genuine stamp


Type I - Postal forgery
1. The bottom of the E is not proportionate
2. Many oval pearls are broken and uneven
3. The eye brow does not thin out
4. Heavily shaded overall

2 used type I forgeries


Type II forgery - probably a Segui forgery
Generally well executed
1. Many oval pearls are broken
2. White space in the hair on top
3. The eyebrow is not solid



1. Very thick letters and numerals
2. The eye is heavily shaded
3. Oval pearls are broken are missing or broken
4. Heavy shading in the neck and hair


2 Rls Forgeries
Ed 68 genuine stamp


Type I Postal forgery
1. E missing bottom left serif
2. S of Rs is too large
3. Oval pearls are broken are missing or broken


Type II forgery
1. Large numeral 2
2. S of Rs is too large
3. Oval pearls are broken are missing or broken
4. Top letters are thicker


BARCELONA to NEW YORK cover with 3 stamps of type I and a stamp of type II.


Very crude forgery - probably a Torres creation
This forgery has no redeeming qualities
1. The head is completely different
2. The bottom letters and numerals
are very large and thick
3. Much of the frame is missing


References
-SPAIN FORGERIES 1850 to 1925 by De Haene
-FFE #7 FORGERIES SPAIN
-Timbrex – H. Schloss
-Forged Stamps of all Countries – Dorn
-HANDBUCH DER BRIEFMARKENKUNDE HEFT 6: CARLISTISCHE POST – H. NEUES
-Album Weeds – Earree
-Spain Specialized Vol.1 1850-1931 - Unificado
-Spain & Dependencies - Edifil 2009
-Tedesco Forgery Index
-Fournier Album - Geneva Phil. Soc.
-WW Torres Forgery Catalog - 1879
-Klaseboer Forgery CD Vol 2 2019
-Handbok Fer Filatelister – S. Tullberg
-Guia del coleccionista de sellos de Correos de España, 1850-54 – Tort
-Comparative Stamp Forgery Identification Site - Claghorn 2009
-Many of the common auction sites that provided ample material

No comments:

Post a Comment

THANK YOU for the feedback. Your comment will be reviewed and appear on this blog within 24 hours
Do you have any pic to share? Use this code [img]your-image-url-here[/img]